Side-by-side

Sembly AI vs Fireflies.ai

Sembly AIFireflies.ai

Bottom line: Sembly AI for professional services and agency teams; Fireflies.ai for sales and customer success teams that review calls at scale.

	Sembly AI Sembly AI is an AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams Visit	Fireflies.ai Fireflies.ai is an AI meeting assistant that automatically transcribes, summarizes, and analyzes conversations across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and other video conferencing platforms. Visit
Votes	0	0
Pricing	Freemium	Freemium
Category	Meeting Assistants	Meeting Assistants
Tags	transcribe-meetingsanalyze-data	transcribe-meetingsanalyze-data
Best for	Professional services and agency teams Project management offices Teams running high volumes of client-facing meetings	Sales and customer success teams that review calls at scale Distributed and multilingual teams needing 100+ language transcription Individuals wanting hands-free automated meeting notes
Pros	Captures meetings across all three major conferencing platforms—Zoom Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams—so teams aren't locked into a single ecosystem. Goes beyond transcription to extract structured action items with assigned owners and due dates, turning conversations into trackable follow-ups. Builds a searchable, centralized meeting database that makes past discussions and decisions easy to retrieve. Can attend meetings as a proxy on the user's behalf, ensuring notes are captured even when the person can't join.	Broad meeting coverage: bots join Zoom Google Meet Microsoft Teams, and other platforms, and you can also upload existing audio and video files for transcription. Strong multilingual support with transcription in 100+ languages plus automatic language detection, which is a meaningful edge for international and distributed teams. AskFred turns every transcript into a searchable, queryable knowledge base, letting users pull decisions, action items, and answers conversationally instead of re-reading full recordings.
Cons	Long meetings are sometimes split into multiple smaller segments rather than delivered as a single continuous summary, which can fragment the record. Feature limits and quotas vary considerably across plan tiers, so buyers need to verify what's actually included at their price point. As an agentic meeting tool that records and stores conversation data, it requires clear internal policies and participant awareness around recording and consent. The depth of vertical and departmental automation may be more than solo users or lightweight note-takers need.	The AI credit system complicates the 'unlimited' marketing—AskFred and advanced analytics draw down credits, so power users may hit limits or need a pricier tier sooner than expected. Storage is capped by tier, and the free plan's limited storage means older recordings and transcripts can become inaccessible without upgrading. Deploying a recording bot into every meeting raises privacy and consent considerations that some organizations and external participants may resist. Advanced features like conversation intelligence and team analytics are gated to Business and Enterprise plans, so smaller teams don't get the full analytics value at entry pricing.

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.