Side-by-side

Otter.ai vs Fireflies.ai

Otter.aiFireflies.ai

Bottom line: Otter.ai for sales teams needing call notes and CRM sync; Fireflies.ai for sales and customer success teams that review calls at scale.

	Otter.ai Otter.ai is an AI-powered meeting transcription tool that automatically records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings from Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet. Visit	Fireflies.ai Fireflies.ai is an AI meeting assistant that automatically transcribes, summarizes, and analyzes conversations across Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and other video conferencing platforms. Visit
Votes	0	0
Pricing	Freemium	Freemium
Category	Meeting Assistants	Meeting Assistants
Tags	transcribe-meetings	transcribe-meetingsanalyze-data
Best for	Sales teams needing call notes and CRM sync Students and educators capturing lectures Journalists and media professionals transcribing interviews	Sales and customer success teams that review calls at scale Distributed and multilingual teams needing 100+ language transcription Individuals wanting hands-free automated meeting notes
Pros	Deep native integration with Zoom Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet means Otter can auto-join scheduled meetings and capture transcripts without manual setup on each call Real-time transcription with speaker identification produces a live, searchable record during the meeting rather than requiring post-processing AI Chat lets users query across their entire meeting history to pull insights, decisions, and action items, turning transcripts into a knowledge base Role-specific agents for sales, recruiting, education, and media connect notes and follow-ups directly into workflows like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Greenhouse	Broad meeting coverage: bots join Zoom Google Meet Microsoft Teams, and other platforms, and you can also upload existing audio and video files for transcription. Strong multilingual support with transcription in 100+ languages plus automatic language detection, which is a meaningful edge for international and distributed teams. AskFred turns every transcript into a searchable, queryable knowledge base, letting users pull decisions, action items, and answers conversationally instead of re-reading full recordings.
Cons	The free plan's 300-minute cap and 3-import limit are consumed quickly by anyone with a regular meeting load, pushing most serious users toward paid tiers Transcription accuracy degrades with heavy accents, crosstalk, technical jargon, and poor audio quality, so summaries often need human review before sharing Advanced CRM integrations API access, and admin controls are gated behind higher Pro, Business, and Enterprise tiers, so per-seat costs add up for teams Auto-joining bots recording meetings raises consent and privacy considerations that require clear internal policies before broad rollout	The AI credit system complicates the 'unlimited' marketing—AskFred and advanced analytics draw down credits, so power users may hit limits or need a pricier tier sooner than expected. Storage is capped by tier, and the free plan's limited storage means older recordings and transcripts can become inaccessible without upgrading. Deploying a recording bot into every meeting raises privacy and consent considerations that some organizations and external participants may resist. Advanced features like conversation intelligence and team analytics are gated to Business and Enterprise plans, so smaller teams don't get the full analytics value at entry pricing.

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.