Windmill
automation
Turn scripts into workflows, APIs, and internal tools.
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Head-to-head comparison
Windmill vs n8n
Compare Windmill and n8n side by side across pricing, features, ratings, pros, cons, best-fit use cases, and alternatives.
n8n
automation
n8n is an open-source workflow automation platform that lets users build complex automations through a visual, node-based interface
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Feature comparison
Feature
Windmill
n8n
Category
automation
automation
Pricing
Free plan
Free plan
Free plan
API access
Mobile app
Browser extension
Team collaboration
Custom training
Self-hosted option
Offline mode
Multi-language support
Windmill pros and cons
Auto-generates web UIs and webhooks from your scripts, with no frontend work required
Polyglot: Python, TypeScript, Go, Bash, SQL, PowerShell, Rust, and more in one platform
Many triggers (schedules, webhooks, HTTP routes, Kafka, WebSockets, email) plus a flow and low-code app builder
Fast, self-hostable engine with a Rust backend, Postgres queue, and nsjail sandboxing; deploys via Docker Compose or Kubernetes
AGPL-3.0 plus proprietary Community Edition features: commercial redistribution, embedding, or managed-service use requires a paid license
Self-hosting requires running and maintaining Postgres and worker infrastructure
The project states it is not currently seeking outside contributions, limiting community code input
n8n pros and cons
The hybrid no-code/code model is genuinely flexible: you can build the majority of a workflow visually and then drop into JavaScript or Python for the parts that need custom logic, avoiding the dead ends common to pure no-code tools.
Self-hosting under a fair-code license gives teams full control over data residency and infrastructure, which matters for security operations, compliance-sensitive workloads, and organizations that don't want sensitive data routed through a third-party cloud.
Execution-based pricing that charges per completed workflow run, rather than per step or per user, can dramatically lower costs for complex multi-step automations and removes the seat-counting friction of per-user platforms.
Strong AI and agent tooling is built in, with nodes for LLM connections
The platform has a meaningful learning curve; its power and code-friendly design assume technical comfort, making it less approachable for non-technical business users than simpler no-code automation tools.
Self-hosting trades licensing savings for operational overhead — you take on hosting, scaling, monitoring, and maintenance, and AI agent token costs accrue on top regardless of deployment.
Execution-based pricing is cost-efficient but can be hard to predict, since high-volume or frequently triggered workflows can consume execution allowances faster than expected.
Which one should you choose?
Best overall signal
n8n
Selected using Toolglade popularity signals such as views and votes.
Best value signal
Windmill
Selected using free-plan availability and engagement signals.
Best for
Windmill
- teams
- developers
n8n
- Developers and technical teams who want code flexibility inside a visual builder
- DevOps and IT operations teams automating internal processes
- Security operations teams handling incident enrichment and response
- Organizations needing self-hosted automation for compliance or data control
- Teams building AI agents and RAG workflows on top of their own data
FAQ
Is Windmill better than n8n?
It depends on your use case. Compare category fit, pricing, feature availability, and ratings before choosing.
Which tool has a free plan?
Windmill and n8n offer a free plan based on current Toolglade data.