Windmill
automation
Turn scripts into workflows, APIs, and internal tools.
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Head-to-head comparison
Windmill vs Make
Compare Windmill and Make side by side across pricing, features, ratings, pros, cons, best-fit use cases, and alternatives.
Make
automation
Make is a visual workflow automation platform that connects over 3,000 apps and services, enabling users to build automated workflows without extensive coding
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Feature comparison
Feature
Windmill
Make
Category
automation
automation
Pricing
Free plan
Free plan
Free plan
API access
Mobile app
Browser extension
Team collaboration
Custom training
Self-hosted option
Offline mode
Multi-language support
Windmill pros and cons
Auto-generates web UIs and webhooks from your scripts, with no frontend work required
Polyglot: Python, TypeScript, Go, Bash, SQL, PowerShell, Rust, and more in one platform
Many triggers (schedules, webhooks, HTTP routes, Kafka, WebSockets, email) plus a flow and low-code app builder
Fast, self-hostable engine with a Rust backend, Postgres queue, and nsjail sandboxing; deploys via Docker Compose or Kubernetes
AGPL-3.0 plus proprietary Community Edition features: commercial redistribution, embedding, or managed-service use requires a paid license
Self-hosting requires running and maintaining Postgres and worker infrastructure
The project states it is not currently seeking outside contributions, limiting community code input
Make pros and cons
The visual scenario builder makes complex, multi-branch automations far easier to design and audit than linear step-based tools, with data flow and logic represented clearly on a single canvas.
A library of 3
000+ pre-built app connectors, backed by generic HTTP, webhook, and custom app modules, means nearly any API can be reached even when a native integration is missing.
Make is genuinely AI-native, offering agentic automation, ready-made AI agents, and an MCP server that lets AI assistants trigger real actions across connected apps rather than just generating text.
The visual canvas is powerful but has a real learning curve; newcomers to automation often find its data mapping, iterators, and error handling harder to grasp than simpler competitors.
The recently introduced credit-based billing model can make costs harder to predict, since advanced and AI-powered actions may consume more credits than a standard operation.
Complex scenarios can become difficult to maintain and debug at scale, and heavy reliance on the platform creates a degree of workflow lock-in.
Which one should you choose?
Best overall signal
Make
Selected using Toolglade popularity signals such as views and votes.
Best value signal
Windmill
Selected using free-plan availability and engagement signals.
Best for
Windmill
- teams
- developers
Make
- Operations and marketing teams automating multi-step, cross-app processes
- No-code and low-code builders who want visual control over complex logic
- Businesses running high-volume workflows sensitive to per-operation cost
- Teams experimenting with AI agents and agentic automation
- Technical users who need to reach APIs without native connectors
FAQ
Is Windmill better than Make?
It depends on your use case. Compare category fit, pricing, feature availability, and ratings before choosing.
Which tool has a free plan?
Windmill and Make offer a free plan based on current Toolglade data.