Skip to main content
OpenEvidence logo

OpenEvidence

AI clinical answer engine that gives physicians cited, literature-grounded medical answers.

research#medical#healthcare#clinical-research
Free plan Claimed Mobile app
Toolglade’s take

A genuinely useful, citation-first answer engine for clinicians. The free-for-verified-HCPs, ad-supported model is unusual but real, though it means access is limited to credentialed professionals and it is explicitly not a substitute for clinical judgment.

About OpenEvidence

OpenEvidence is an AI clinical answer engine for verified healthcare professionals that responds to medical questions with synthesized, source-cited answers grounded in peer-reviewed literature. It partners with publishers like NEJM and JAMA and is free for verified U.S. clinicians, funded through advertising. The product is available on the web and via mobile apps.

OpenEvidence is a clinical decision-support answer engine built for physicians and other healthcare professionals. Clinicians type a natural-language question and receive a synthesized, cited answer drawn from the medical literature, including content from partners such as The New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA Network. Every response links to its primary sources so users can verify the underlying studies and guidelines rather than trusting an opaque summary. The platform is free for verified U.S. healthcare professionals and is supported by advertising, with access gated behind clinician (HCP) verification. Founded by Daniel Nadler and launched out of the Mayo Clinic Platform Accelerate program, OpenEvidence positions itself as a way to tame the medical information firehose and support more evidence-based decisions at the point of care. It is available on the web and via iOS and Android apps.

TL;DR

OpenEvidence is an AI-powered clinical answer engine that gives verified healthcare professionals natural-language answers grounded in peer-reviewed medical literature, with inline citations to primary sources. It is free for verified U.S. clinicians and supported by advertising, with partnerships including NEJM and JAMA Network. Founded by Daniel Nadler and launched from the Mayo Clinic Platform Accelerate program, it is used across 10,000+ care centers. The company has raised roughly $700M and reached a reported $12B valuation by early 2026.

Company overview

OpenEvidence is a medical AI company building what it describes as the leading AI-powered medical information platform, with a mission to organize the world's medical knowledge and make it more open, accessible, and understandable. It was founded by Daniel Nadler (PhD, Harvard; previously founder of Kensho Technologies) and launched out of the Mayo Clinic Platform Accelerate program, and has been featured by the New England Journal of Medicine AI. The company has assembled a team of AI researchers from Harvard, MIT, and Stanford alongside a roster of medical advisors from institutions including Mayo Clinic, Cedars-Sinai, UCSF, Cleveland Clinic, and Massachusetts General Hospital.

The product is reported to be one of the fastest-growing applications for physicians, trusted by medical professionals at more than 10,000 care centers across the United States. It operates a distinctive business model: the service is free for verified U.S. clinicians and monetized through advertising, and it maintains content partnerships with major publishers such as the New England Journal of Medicine and the JAMA Network.

Product features

The core product lets a verified clinician ask a natural-language clinical question and receive a synthesized answer that aggregates and summarizes relevant evidence, with inline citations linking back to the primary studies, reviews, and guidelines. It draws on the broad medical literature plus partner content from NEJM and JAMA Network, aiming to help physicians keep up with a body of research that is doubling roughly every five years. Answers are conversational and support follow-up questions.

OpenEvidence is available on the web and through native iOS and Android apps, gated behind HCP verification. The company is explicit that the tool is a technology demonstrator that does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, that inputs are not covered by HIPAA, and that users must avoid submitting protected health information.

Target market

OpenEvidence targets licensed healthcare professionals in the United States: physicians and specialists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, and medical residents and trainees. Access is limited to users who complete HCP verification, so the platform is deliberately not aimed at patients or general consumers. Its value proposition centers on fast, evidence-based answers at the point of care and staying current with the rapidly expanding medical literature.

Buyer personas

End users

Verified U.S. healthcare professionals: physicians and specialists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, and medical residents and trainees who need fast, cited answers to clinical questions.

Buyers

There is effectively no traditional buyer for end users, since the product is free for verified clinicians and funded by advertising; the paying customers are advertisers (notably pharmaceutical and life-sciences brands) seeking to reach clinicians.

Key influencers

Medical advisors, department chairs, chief medical information officers, and specialty society peers whose adoption and endorsement drive clinician uptake within health systems.

Ideal customer profile

A practicing, credentialed U.S. clinician who regularly faces complex evidence questions at the point of care and wants literature-grounded, citable answers faster than manual searching; on the monetization side, an advertiser aiming to reach a verified physician audience.

Funding & performance

OpenEvidence has raised roughly $700 million across a rapid sequence of rounds. Reported milestones include a ~$75M Series A led by Sequoia Capital in early 2025 at a ~$1B valuation; a $210M Series B co-led by GV and Kleiner Perkins in July 2025 at a $3.5B valuation; a ~$200M Series C led by GV in October 2025 at a ~$6B valuation; and a $250M Series D led by Thrive Capital and DST Global reported in early 2026 at a ~$12B valuation. Investors include Sequoia Capital, GV (Google Ventures), Kleiner Perkins, Breyer Capital, Conviction (Conviction Partners), Mayo Clinic, Blackstone, Thrive Capital, Coatue, and others.

Pros & cons

Pros

  • Answers are grounded in peer-reviewed medical literature with inline citations
  • Completely free for verified U.S. healthcare professionals
  • Partnerships with NEJM and JAMA Network add high-quality sourced content
  • Fast natural-language answers that save time versus manual literature searches
  • Available on web plus iOS and Android apps
  • Backed by clinical advisors and used across thousands of U.S. care centers

Cons

  • Access is restricted to verified healthcare professionals, not the general public
  • Ad-supported model means clinicians see advertising within the experience
  • Explicitly not a source of medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment and not HIPAA-covered
  • Primarily focused on the U.S. market and English-language content
  • No public API or self-hosted option for institutional integration

Pricing plans

Free for verified clinicians
Free
  • HCP verification
  • ad-supported
  • cited answers

Key features

Mobile app
Integrations
New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA Network, Mayo Clinic Platform
Input types
text
Output types
text
Best For
physicians, clinical decision support, medical literature search, point-of-care evidence lookup

Compare key features

View all alternatives →
Feature
OpenEvidence
SciSpace
Andi
Pricing
Free
Freemium
Freemium
Free plan
Yes
Yes
Yes
Free trial
No
Yes
No
Team support
No
Yes
No

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenEvidence free?+

Yes. OpenEvidence is free for verified U.S. healthcare professionals. The platform is supported by advertising rather than user subscriptions, so verified clinicians can use it at no cost after completing HCP verification.

Who can use OpenEvidence?+

OpenEvidence is built for verified healthcare professionals such as physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, pharmacists, and medical trainees. Access requires HCP verification confirming you are a licensed clinician, and it is currently focused on the U.S. market.

Is OpenEvidence reliable and properly sourced?+

OpenEvidence grounds its answers in peer-reviewed medical literature and provides inline citations to primary studies and guidelines, including content from partners like the New England Journal of Medicine and JAMA Network. It is designed so clinicians can verify sources, but it is explicitly not medical advice and should be used alongside professional judgment.

How is OpenEvidence different from UpToDate?+

UpToDate is a subscription-based, editorially curated clinical reference with expert-authored topic summaries. OpenEvidence is an AI answer engine that responds to natural-language questions with synthesized, cited answers drawn from the broader literature, and it is free for verified clinicians rather than subscription-based. Many clinicians use them as complementary tools.

Is OpenEvidence for patients?+

No. OpenEvidence is intended for verified healthcare professionals, not patients or general consumers. It requires HCP verification, does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, and inputs are not covered by HIPAA, so it is not designed for patient use.

Reviews (0)

Write a review

Pick a rating
Loading reviews…
Compare

Compare OpenEvidence with other AI tools

Side-by-side pages for pricing, features, and best-fit use cases.

All comparisons →

Similar tools you may like