Skip to main content
Nabla logo

Nabla

Ambient AI assistant that turns patient conversations into structured clinical notes

audio#medical-scribe#healthcare#clinical-documentation
Free plan Free trial Claimed API Teams Mobile app Browser extension
Toolglade’s take

Nabla is one of the strongest ambient AI scribes for enterprise health systems, with genuine multi-EHR depth and a free tier that lets individual clinicians try it risk-free. Serious buyers should expect a sales-led, per-clinician contract rather than transparent self-serve pricing.

About Nabla

Nabla is an ambient AI medical scribe that listens to clinician-patient conversations and drafts structured, EHR-ready notes with automated ICD-10 coding. It runs across desktop, native macOS, and mobile (including inside Epic's Haiku app), supports 35+ languages, and is deployed across 150+ health systems. Its HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001 posture plus deep multi-EHR integration make it a leading enterprise scribe alongside Abridge and Nuance DAX Copilot.

Nabla is a Paris-founded, US-scaled ambient AI clinical assistant that captures the natural conversation between clinician and patient, then generates an accurate, structured note ready for review and sign-off. Beyond note-taking, it adds dictation, real-time ICD-10 coding suggestions, and a proactive coding/CDI agent, and it runs on desktop, a native macOS dictation app, and mobile including embedding inside Epic's Haiku app. Built for enterprise healthcare, Nabla is deployed across 150+ health systems and provider groups, supports 35+ languages, and is HIPAA-compliant, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001 certified. It joined the Epic Toolbox and offers Nabla Connect, a plug-and-play module to embed ambient AI in virtually any EHR, making it a serious contender against Abridge, Nuance DAX Copilot, and DeepScribe.

TL;DR

Nabla is an ambient AI clinical assistant that turns patient conversations into structured, coded notes ready for EHR sign-off. It is deployed across 150+ health systems, supports 35+ languages, and integrates natively with Epic (Epic Toolbox, Haiku) and 20+ other EHRs. It is HIPAA-compliant, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001 certified, with a free tier and a ~$119/clinician/month Pro plan. Backed by $120M in total funding including a $70M Series C in 2025.

Company overview

Nabla is a healthcare AI company headquartered in Paris, France, building an agentic AI assistant for clinical workflows. Its flagship product, Nabla Copilot, is an ambient AI scribe used by tens of thousands of clinicians across more than 150 health systems and provider groups, spanning over 20 million annual encounters. The company has expanded aggressively in the US enterprise market, joining the Epic Toolbox and landing deployments with organizations such as M Health Fairview and University of Toledo Health.

Nabla has raised roughly $120M in total funding, including a $70M Series C announced in June 2025 led by HV Capital, with Highland Europe, DST Global, Cathay Innovation, and Tony Fadell's Build Collective participating. The capital is funding a push from documentation into broader agentic clinical workflows, including proactive coding and clinical documentation integrity.

Product features

The core product ambiently listens to clinician-patient conversations and drafts structured notes in seconds, which clinicians review and sign as the legal author. It layers on dictation, real-time ICD-10 coding suggestions (with HCC and CPT coding expanding), and a Proactive Coding Agent that surfaces CDI nudges. Notes export as structured data directly into EHR fields, flowsheets, and templates.

Nabla runs on desktop, a native on-device macOS dictation app, and mobile including an embed inside Epic's Haiku app with no separate login or install. It integrates with 20+ EHRs (Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, NextGen, Greenway, AryaEHR) and offers Nabla Connect, a plug-and-play module to embed ambient AI in any EHR. It supports 35+ languages and maintains HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, and ISO 27001 compliance with configurable data retention.

Target market

Nabla targets healthcare organizations across the spectrum, from individual clinicians and small practices (served via the free and Pro tiers) to large hospital systems, multi-specialty groups, and telehealth companies (served via custom Enterprise deployments). Its multilingual support and multi-EHR flexibility make it especially relevant for diverse patient populations and organizations running mixed EHR environments, while its Epic-native integrations appeal to the large share of US health systems standardized on Epic.

Buyer personas

End users

Physicians, nurse practitioners, residents, and other clinicians who use Nabla during encounters to reduce charting time and after-hours documentation, plus interns and residents who use the free unlimited tier.

Buyers

Health system CMIOs, CIOs, chief clinical officers, VPs of clinical informatics, and practice administrators who evaluate and purchase ambient AI documentation at the organization level.

Key influencers

EHR/IT integration leads, compliance and security officers (HIPAA/SOC 2/BAA review), clinical documentation integrity and coding teams, and physician champions piloting the tool.

Ideal customer profile

A mid-to-large health system, multi-specialty group, or telehealth provider running Epic or another major EHR, facing clinician burnout and documentation burden, serving multilingual patient populations, and needing an enterprise-grade, compliant ambient AI scribe with deep EHR integration.

Funding & performance

Approximately $120M in total funding, including a $70M Series C announced June 2025 led by HV Capital, with participation from Highland Europe, DST Global, Cathay Innovation, and Build Collective (Tony Fadell). A January 2024 round reportedly valued the company around $180M; the Series C valuation is not publicly disclosed.

Pros & cons

Pros

  • Deep, native integration with Epic (Epic Toolbox, Haiku) and 20+ other EHRs
  • Strong compliance posture: HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, with BAA
  • Free tier lets individual clinicians and residents try it with no cost
  • 35+ language support for diverse patient populations
  • Documented outcomes: hours saved per week and reduced burnout in case studies
  • Audio processed in-browser and not stored on Nabla servers per vendor docs

Cons

  • Paid and enterprise pricing is not published; buying is sales-led
  • Learning curve for clinicians adjusting to AI-drafted notes
  • Note generation is the core focus; broad admin workflows may need other tools
  • Individual-clinician customization is limited versus enterprise deployments
  • Reliance on device microphones and connectivity during encounters

Pricing plans

Free
$0 / monthly
  • Up to 30 consultations per month
  • Ambient AI note generation
  • EHR integration
  • Unlimited consultations for interns and residents
  • Mobile and desktop access
Pro
$119 / monthly
  • Unlimited consultations per clinician
  • EHR integration and structured note export
  • Dictation and real-time ICD-10 coding suggestions
  • 35+ language support
  • For individual clinicians and small practices
Enterprise
Contact sales
  • Custom deployment for hospitals and telehealth companies
  • Nabla Connect embed into any EHR (Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, etc.)
  • SAML SSO and tailored ML models
  • Proactive coding / CDI agent
  • BAA, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 compliance
  • Dedicated support and configurable data retention

Key features

API
Mobile app
Browser extension
Team collaboration
Multi-language
Integrations
Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth, NextGen, Greenway Health, AryaEHR
Input types
audio
Output types
text
Best For
Health systems, Physician practices, Telehealth providers, Multilingual clinical settings

Compare key features

View all alternatives →
Feature
Nabla
Abridge
Freed
Pricing
Freemium
Contact for pricing
Paid
Free plan
Yes
No
No
Free trial
Yes
No
Yes
API
Yes
Yes
No
Team support
Yes
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked questions

Is Nabla worth it for medical documentation?+

For clinicians and health systems drowning in charting, Nabla is a strong choice. Case studies cite roughly 2.6 hours saved per clinician per week and sustained reductions in burnout, plus faster chart closure. Its deep EHR integration and free tier make it easy to validate before committing to a paid or enterprise plan.

How much does Nabla cost?+

Nabla has a free tier (up to 30 consultations per month, unlimited for interns and residents), a Pro plan at approximately $119 per clinician per month for unlimited consultations, and custom Enterprise pricing. Nabla does not publish full pricing publicly, so multi-clinician and enterprise deals are quoted through a sales demo.

Is Nabla HIPAA compliant and secure?+

Yes. Nabla is HIPAA-compliant and will sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA). It is SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certified. Per Nabla's published security documentation, encounter audio is processed in the browser and is not stored on Nabla servers, and transcript/note retention is configurable (14 days by default). The clinician remains the legal author and must review notes before signing.

What are the best Nabla alternatives?+

The main alternatives are Abridge, Nuance DAX Copilot (Microsoft), DeepScribe, Suki, and Heidi Health. Nabla differentiates with broad multi-EHR support (20+ systems including a native Epic Toolbox integration and Nabla Connect for any EHR), 35+ language coverage, and a genuinely free tier for individual clinicians.

Nabla vs Abridge: which ambient AI scribe is better?+

Both are top-tier enterprise ambient scribes with deep Epic integration. Abridge is known for its large health-system deployments and coding depth, while Nabla emphasizes broad multi-EHR flexibility (Nabla Connect works with virtually any EHR), 35+ language support, on-device macOS dictation, and a free tier. The best fit depends on your EHR mix, language needs, and whether you want a no-cost trial path for clinicians.

Reviews (0)

Write a review

Pick a rating
Loading reviews…
Compare

Compare Nabla with other AI tools

Side-by-side pages for pricing, features, and best-fit use cases.

All comparisons →

From the blog

All articles →

Similar tools you may like