Skip to main content
Head-to-head comparison

Langfuse vs OpenObserve

Compare Langfuse and OpenObserve side by side across pricing, features, ratings, pros, cons, best-fit use cases, and alternatives.

Feature comparison

Feature
Langfuse
OpenObserve
Category
llm-observability
llm-observability
Pricing
Free plan
Free plan
Free plan
API access
Mobile app
Browser extension
Team collaboration
Custom training
Self-hosted option
Offline mode
Multi-language support

Langfuse pros and cons

Open source with nearly all features MIT-licensed
Self-host the full product free, no seat or usage caps
Framework-agnostic (works with or without LangChain)
Strong tracing, prompt management, and evaluation
Self-hosting still requires running infrastructure
Enterprise compliance features are commercial
Cloud Pro tier jumps significantly in price

OpenObserve pros and cons

Agent traces are standard OpenTelemetry spans, not a silo
Per-span token cost from your own model pricing
Unlimited users with no per-seat charge
AGPL-3.0 core with a self-hosted option
LLM observability is labelled preview
Online evaluations are an enterprise feature
Ingestion-based pricing needs volume forecasting

Which one should you choose?

Best overall signal
Langfuse

Selected using Toolglade popularity signals such as views and votes.

Best value signal
Langfuse

Selected using free-plan availability and engagement signals.

Best for

Langfuse

  • LLM tracing
  • Prompt management
  • Evaluations
  • Self-hosted observability
  • Teams wanting open-source LLM observability

OpenObserve

  • agent tracing
  • llm cost attribution
  • unified observability
  • Teams running agents in production
  • Platform teams already using OpenTelemetry

FAQ

Is Langfuse better than OpenObserve?

It depends on your use case. Compare category fit, pricing, feature availability, and ratings before choosing.

Which tool has a free plan?

Langfuse and OpenObserve offer a free plan based on current Toolglade data.