Skip to main content

Workday AI vs Make

Workday AIMake

Bottom line: Workday AI for large enterprises already using Workday; Make for operations and marketing teams automating multi-step, cross-app processes.

Workday AI is a suite of AI capabilities embedded within Workday's enterprise HR and finance platform, designed to help large organizations automate workflows, improve talent strategies, and streamlin

Visit

Make is a visual workflow automation platform that connects over 3,000 apps and services, enabling users to build automated workflows without extensive coding

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreemiumFreemium
CategoryAutomationAutomation
Tags
automate-workflowsanalyze-data
automate-workflows
Best for
  • Large enterprises already using Workday
  • HR and talent teams pursuing skills-based strategies
  • Workforce planning and analytics functions
  • Operations and marketing teams automating multi-step, cross-app processes
  • No-code and low-code builders who want visual control over complex logic
  • Businesses running high-volume workflows sensitive to per-operation cost
Pros
  • AI capabilities live inside the same system of record used for core HR and finance, so insights and automation act on live organizational data instead of disconnected exports.
  • Skills Cloud and skills intelligence give large employers a structured way to map, match, and develop workforce capabilities across recruiting, internal mobility, and planning.
  • The Flex Credits model bundles AI agents and platform capabilities into a subscription pool, offering more budget predictability than pure per-token consumption pricing.
  • Deep footprint across HR, finance, and workforce planning means AI features can span talent and financial workflows within one governed platform.
  • Enterprise-grade governance, security, and administrative controls come with the broader Workday platform rather than being bolted on.
  • The visual scenario builder makes complex, multi-branch automations far easier to design and audit than linear step-based tools, with data flow and logic represented clearly on a single canvas.
  • A library of 3
  • 000+ pre-built app connectors, backed by generic HTTP, webhook, and custom app modules, means nearly any API can be reached even when a native integration is missing.
  • Make is genuinely AI-native, offering agentic automation, ready-made AI agents, and an MCP server that lets AI assistants trigger real actions across connected apps rather than just generating text.
  • The pricing is competitive for high-volume workflows, with an operations-heavy allowance at entry-level tiers and a no-time-limit free plan for experimentation.
Cons
  • The AI features are only meaningful for organizations already running Workday, so there is significant platform lock-in and no standalone value for non-customers.
  • Total cost is opaque and enterprise-negotiated; Flex Credit consumption and implementation services can make real spend hard to forecast upfront.
  • Realizing value depends on clean, well-structured data and often a multi-quarter implementation, which adds meaningful upfront effort and cost.
  • It is aimed squarely at large enterprises, leaving small and mid-market organizations underserved by both pricing and complexity.
  • The visual canvas is powerful but has a real learning curve; newcomers to automation often find its data mapping, iterators, and error handling harder to grasp than simpler competitors.
  • The recently introduced credit-based billing model can make costs harder to predict, since advanced and AI-powered actions may consume more credits than a standard operation.
  • Complex scenarios can become difficult to maintain and debug at scale, and heavy reliance on the platform creates a degree of workflow lock-in.
  • There is no self-hosted or offline option, so teams with strict on-premise or air-gapped requirements will need an alternative.

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.