Skip to main content
Tgtoolglade.
Side-by-side
Browse all comparisons →

Gram by Speakeasy vs Glama

Gram by SpeakeasyGlama

Bottom line: Gram by Speakeasy for aPI-first companies; Glama for developers evaluating MCP servers.

Gram by SpeakeasyGram by Speakeasy

Serverless platform to build, curate, and host tools as MCP servers

Visit
GlamaGlama

MCP server registry, in-browser inspector, and gateway with an LLM API bundled in.

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreemiumFreemium
CategoryMcpMcp
Tags
mcpopenapitool-hostingspeakeasyserverless
mcpregistrygatewayllm-apiinspector
Best for
  • API-first companies
  • Teams building agent tools
  • Enterprises needing tool governance
  • Developers evaluating MCP servers
  • Teams wanting gateway governance
  • Open-source server authors seeking free hosting
Pros
  • Generates MCP servers from OpenAPI
  • Custom TypeScript and Python tools
  • Serverless managed hosting
  • OAuth 2.1 with DCR and PKCE
  • RBAC, audit logs, compliance reporting
  • Very large indexed server catalog
  • In-browser MCP Inspector for safe testing
  • Gateway adds logging, access control, and managed OAuth
  • Bundled unified LLM API across major providers
  • Free hosting for open-source servers
Cons
  • Best value with existing OpenAPI specs
  • Newer platform in a fast-moving space
  • MCP ecosystem still maturing
  • Advanced governance likely paid
  • Requires MCP familiarity
  • Self-reported scale is hard to independently verify
  • Per-server-instance pricing may surprise some users
  • Hosted-only platform, no self-hosting of Glama itself
  • Crowded, fast-changing registry landscape
  • Third-party server trust remains the user's responsibility

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.