Make
automation
Make is a visual workflow automation platform that connects over 3,000 apps and services, enabling users to build automated workflows without extensive coding
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Head-to-head comparison
Make vs Zendesk AI
Compare Make and Zendesk AI side by side across pricing, features, ratings, pros, cons, best-fit use cases, and alternatives.
Zendesk AI
customer-support
Zendesk AI is an AI-powered customer service platform that automates ticket resolution and assists support agents across multiple channels
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Feature comparison
Feature
Make
Zendesk AI
Category
automation
customer-support
Pricing
Free plan
Free plan
Free plan
API access
Mobile app
Browser extension
Team collaboration
Custom training
Self-hosted option
Offline mode
Multi-language support
Make pros and cons
The visual scenario builder makes complex, multi-branch automations far easier to design and audit than linear step-based tools, with data flow and logic represented clearly on a single canvas.
A library of 3
000+ pre-built app connectors, backed by generic HTTP, webhook, and custom app modules, means nearly any API can be reached even when a native integration is missing.
Make is genuinely AI-native, offering agentic automation, ready-made AI agents, and an MCP server that lets AI assistants trigger real actions across connected apps rather than just generating text.
The visual canvas is powerful but has a real learning curve; newcomers to automation often find its data mapping, iterators, and error handling harder to grasp than simpler competitors.
The recently introduced credit-based billing model can make costs harder to predict, since advanced and AI-powered actions may consume more credits than a standard operation.
Complex scenarios can become difficult to maintain and debug at scale, and heavy reliance on the platform creates a degree of workflow lock-in.
Zendesk AI pros and cons
Deeply integrated with Zendesk's mature ticketing, workflow, and reporting infrastructure, so AI capabilities sit on top of a proven support system rather than a bolt-on tool.
Autonomous AI agents can resolve conversations end-to-end across channels while Copilot assists human agents with drafting, ticket summaries, and knowledge suggestions—covering both full automation and agent augmentation.
Broad channel coverage spanning messaging, live chat, email, voice, and self-service help centers, keeping automation consistent across every point of contact.
Extensive ecosystem with 1
Pricing is difficult to predict because AI automation is metered as separate automated resolutions with baseline allowances and overage billing, on top of per-agent seat costs.
Advanced AI capabilities such as hybrid conversation flows
API actions, and advanced analytics live behind paid add-ons, so the sticker price rarely reflects the full cost of a production deployment.
Which one should you choose?
Best overall signal
Make
Selected using Toolglade popularity signals such as views and votes.
Best value signal
Make
Selected using free-plan availability and engagement signals.
Best for
Make
- Operations and marketing teams automating multi-step, cross-app processes
- No-code and low-code builders who want visual control over complex logic
- Businesses running high-volume workflows sensitive to per-operation cost
- Teams experimenting with AI agents and agentic automation
- Technical users who need to reach APIs without native connectors
Zendesk AI
- Established support teams already running on a ticketing system
- High-volume customer service operations seeking automation at scale
- Enterprises needing multichannel support with governance and QA
- Regulated industries requiring enterprise-grade security
- Businesses running both customer and employee (IT) service desks
FAQ
Is Make better than Zendesk AI?
It depends on your use case. Compare category fit, pricing, feature availability, and ratings before choosing.
Which tool has a free plan?
Make and Zendesk AI offer a free plan based on current Toolglade data.