Make
automation
Make is a visual workflow automation platform that connects over 3,000 apps and services, enabling users to build automated workflows without extensive coding
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Head-to-head comparison
Make vs n8n
Compare Make and n8n side by side across pricing, features, ratings, pros, cons, best-fit use cases, and alternatives.
n8n
automation
n8n is an open-source workflow automation platform that lets users build complex automations through a visual, node-based interface
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Feature comparison
Feature
Make
n8n
Category
automation
automation
Pricing
Free plan
Free plan
Free plan
API access
Mobile app
Browser extension
Team collaboration
Custom training
Self-hosted option
Offline mode
Multi-language support
Make pros and cons
The visual scenario builder makes complex, multi-branch automations far easier to design and audit than linear step-based tools, with data flow and logic represented clearly on a single canvas.
A library of 3
000+ pre-built app connectors, backed by generic HTTP, webhook, and custom app modules, means nearly any API can be reached even when a native integration is missing.
Make is genuinely AI-native, offering agentic automation, ready-made AI agents, and an MCP server that lets AI assistants trigger real actions across connected apps rather than just generating text.
Note: The visual canvas is powerful but has a real learning curve; newcomers to automation often find its data mapping, iterators, and error handling harder to grasp than simpler competitors.
Note: The recently introduced credit-based billing model can make costs harder to predict, since advanced and AI-powered actions may consume more credits than a standard operation.
Note: Complex scenarios can become difficult to maintain and debug at scale, and heavy reliance on the platform creates a degree of workflow lock-in.
n8n pros and cons
The hybrid no-code/code model is genuinely flexible: you can build the majority of a workflow visually and then drop into JavaScript or Python for the parts that need custom logic, avoiding the dead ends common to pure no-code tools.
Self-hosting under a fair-code license gives teams full control over data residency and infrastructure, which matters for security operations, compliance-sensitive workloads, and organizations that don't want sensitive data routed through a third-party cloud.
Execution-based pricing that charges per completed workflow run, rather than per step or per user, can dramatically lower costs for complex multi-step automations and removes the seat-counting friction of per-user platforms.
Strong AI and agent tooling is built in, with nodes for LLM connections
Note: The platform has a meaningful learning curve; its power and code-friendly design assume technical comfort, making it less approachable for non-technical business users than simpler no-code automation tools.
Note: Self-hosting trades licensing savings for operational overhead — you take on hosting, scaling, monitoring, and maintenance, and AI agent token costs accrue on top regardless of deployment.
Note: Execution-based pricing is cost-efficient but can be hard to predict, since high-volume or frequently triggered workflows can consume execution allowances faster than expected.
Which one should you choose?
Best overall signal
n8n
Selected using Toolglade popularity signals such as views and votes.
Best value signal
Make
Selected using free-plan availability and engagement signals.
Best for
Make
- Operations and marketing teams automating multi-step, cross-app processes
- No-code and low-code builders who want visual control over complex logic
- Businesses running high-volume workflows sensitive to per-operation cost
- Teams experimenting with AI agents and agentic automation
- Technical users who need to reach APIs without native connectors
n8n
- Developers and technical teams who want code flexibility inside a visual builder
- DevOps and IT operations teams automating internal processes
- Security operations teams handling incident enrichment and response
- Organizations needing self-hosted automation for compliance or data control
- Teams building AI agents and RAG workflows on top of their own data
FAQ
Is Make better than n8n?
It depends on your use case. Compare category fit, pricing, feature availability, and ratings before choosing.
Which tool has a free plan?
Make and n8n offer a free plan based on current Toolglade data.