Letta
agent-frameworks
Stateful AI agents with long-term memory (formerly MemGPT).
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Head-to-head comparison
Letta vs Coze
Compare Letta and Coze side by side across pricing, features, ratings, pros, cons, best-fit use cases, and alternatives.
Coze
agent-frameworks
ByteDance's no-code studio for building and publishing AI chatbots and agents
Pricing
Free plan
Rating
—
Votes
0
Feature comparison
Feature
Letta
Coze
Category
agent-frameworks
agent-frameworks
Pricing
Free plan
Free plan
Free plan
API access
Mobile app
Browser extension
Team collaboration
Custom training
Self-hosted option
Offline mode
Multi-language support
Letta pros and cons
Purpose-built for the agent memory problem
Strong research pedigree (MemGPT paper)
OS-style tiered memory persists across sessions
Open-source core, free to self-host
Narrower than general agent frameworks
Often used alongside other tooling, not a full stack
Renamed from MemGPT, some older docs use old name
Coze pros and cons
Generous free tier with access to strong models
Genuinely no-code visual builder
Built-in RAG knowledge engine
Wide multi-channel publishing options
Daily usage limits on lower tiers can constrain heavy use
ByteDance ownership raises data-governance concerns for some enterprises
Advanced logic still has a learning curve
Which one should you choose?
Best overall signal
Coze
Selected using Toolglade popularity signals such as views and votes.
Best value signal
Letta
Selected using free-plan availability and engagement signals.
Best for
Letta
- developers
- Teams that need persistent agent memory
- Builders of long-running assistants
- Researchers exploring stateful agents
Coze
- no-code bot building
- multi-channel chatbots
- rapid prototyping
- Indie builders
- Small teams
FAQ
Is Letta better than Coze?
It depends on your use case. Compare category fit, pricing, feature availability, and ratings before choosing.
Which tool has a free plan?
Letta and Coze offer a free plan based on current Toolglade data.