Skip to main content

Trilium vs Jan

TriliumJan

Build a self-hosted second brain and personal wiki.

Visit

Run open-source AI chatbots offline on your own computer.

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreeFree
CategoryNote TakingChatbots
Tags
practical-ossopen-sourceself-hostedknowledge
practical-ossopen-sourceself-hostedoffline
Best for——
Pros
  • Handles very large knowledge bases (100,000+ notes) with a deep, cloneable note tree
  • Attributes, scripting, and a REST API enable powerful automation and custom organization
  • Rich editor plus specialized note types: canvas, mind maps, relation maps, and geo maps
  • Self-hostable with sync, per-note encryption, and OpenID/TOTP login
  • Actively maintained community continuation (TriliumNext) of the original project
  • Runs LLMs fully offline on your own hardware, so conversations stay private by default
  • Simple point-and-click model downloads from Hugging Face, no command line required
  • Genuinely open source under the permissive Apache-2.0 license
  • Exposes an OpenAI-compatible local API server (localhost:1337) for wiring into other apps
  • Optionally connects to cloud providers and supports MCP for agent-style tool use
Cons
  • Steep learning curve and a power-user, feature-dense interface
  • AGPL-3.0 license may limit some commercial or embedded reuse
  • Self-hosting a sync server adds setup and maintenance overhead
  • AI/LLM integration is relatively new and secondary to the core note-taking features
  • Local model quality depends heavily on your RAM and GPU; small models are far weaker than ChatGPT or Claude
  • Decent performance effectively needs 16GB+ RAM and ideally a supported GPU
  • Still maturing, with a fairly high open issue count and occasional rough edges
  • Building from source on Windows is involved and requires a full compiler toolchain

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.