Skip to main content
Tgtoolglade.
Side-by-side
Browse all comparisons →

Relaticle vs Cortex

RelaticleCortex

Bottom line: Relaticle for teams connecting agents to CRM data; Cortex for aPI teams with maintained specifications.

RelaticleRelaticle

Open-source self-hosted CRM with a 37-tool MCP server and approval-gated agent writes

Visit
CortexCortex

Turn API specifications into docs, typed SDKs, and an MCP server

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreemiumFree
CategoryRevenue IntelligenceMcp
Tags
open source crmmcp serverself-hostedagent approvalsagpl
mcp serverapi documentationsdk generationopenapiopen source
Best for
  • Teams connecting agents to CRM data
  • Companies with self-hosting or data residency needs
  • Small teams avoiding per-seat CRM pricing
  • API teams with maintained specifications
  • Teams exposing APIs to agents via MCP
  • Open-source projects needing docs and SDKs
Pros
  • AGPL-3.0 with a genuinely ungated self-hosted edition
  • 37-tool MCP server plus REST API
  • Approval card with five-second undo on risky writes
  • Priced per workspace, never per seat
  • Unlimited users and records on all paths
  • MIT licensed with a public repository
  • Generates docs, SDKs, and an MCP server from one spec
  • Supports OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, GraphQL, gRPC, and OpenRPC
  • Eleven SDK output languages
  • Fully self-hostable, deployable anywhere Node runs
Cons
  • Approval gate covers destructive and update operations, not creates
  • Young product versus established CRM platforms
  • Smaller integration catalogue than mainstream CRMs
  • Self-hosting requires PostgreSQL and Redis operations
  • Enterprise tier starts at a high 20,000 dollars per year
  • Output quality depends entirely on spec quality
  • No hosted service or commercial support
  • Requires a build step in your pipeline
  • No team collaboration features
  • Young project with a small ecosystem

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.