Skip to main content

Onyx vs LlamaIndex

OnyxLlamaIndex

Bottom line: Onyx for engineering-capable teams; LlamaIndex for document-heavy RAG applications.

AI search and chat across your company apps.

Visit

Data framework for LLM apps and knowledge agents

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreemiumFreemium
CategoryEnterprise SearchAi Agents
Tags
ai-assistantenterprise-searchopen-sourcepractical-ossragself-hosted
llm-frameworkragdocument-parsingopen-sourceknowledge-agents
Best for
  • Engineering-capable teams
  • Security and privacy-focused organizations
  • Companies avoiding vendor lock-in
  • Document-heavy RAG applications
  • Enterprise knowledge agents
  • Teams needing reliable PDF parsing
Pros
  • Open-source and MIT-licensed with free self-hosting
  • 40+ connectors to common workplace apps
  • Model-agnostic, works with any LLM
  • Granular access controls and data residency
  • Active GitHub community and rapid development
  • Open-source frameworks are free (MIT)
  • Strong focus on retrieval and data quality
  • LlamaParse excels at complex document parsing
  • Managed LlamaCloud for production data workflows
  • Python and TypeScript support
Cons
  • Self-hosting requires engineering effort to deploy and maintain
  • Less polished onboarding than turnkey SaaS
  • No native mobile app
  • Advanced/enterprise features may need the paid tier
  • Support for self-hosters is community-driven
  • Overlaps with LangChain, adding decision fatigue
  • LlamaCloud credit costs scale with document complexity
  • Framework surface area has grown large
  • Fast-moving APIs can change between versions
  • Advanced agent features less mature than dedicated agent frameworks

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.