Skip to main content

Navina vs Freed

NavinaFreed

Bottom line: Navina for value-based care organizations; Freed for solo and independent clinicians.

AI clinical copilot that turns messy patient data into point-of-care insights

Visit

Ambient AI medical scribe that listens to patient visits and writes structured clinical notes in minutes.

Visit
Votes00
PricingContactPaid
CategoryHealthcareHealthcare
Tags
clinical AIvalue-based carephysician copilotrisk adjustmentEHR
medical-scribehealthcareclinical-documentation
Best for
  • value-based care organizations
  • primary care groups
  • ACOs and IPAs
  • Solo and independent clinicians
  • Small private practices
  • Telehealth providers
Pros
  • Synthesizes fragmented multi-source patient data into clear summaries
  • Purpose-built for value-based care and risk adjustment
  • Strong reported adoption across thousands of clinicians
  • Backed by $100M total funding including a Goldman Sachs-led round
  • Aims directly at reducing physician administrative burden
  • Fast, accurate SOAP notes generated in one to two minutes
  • Simple, transparent pricing that fits solo clinicians
  • Understands 90+ languages and handles mid-visit code-switching
  • HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II compliant
  • Learns each clinician's formatting and note style over time
Cons
  • No public pricing; enterprise sales only
  • Requires EHR integration and IT involvement
  • Focused on value-based care, less relevant to some specialties
  • Value depends on data quality feeding the system
  • Not a fit for small independent practices without VBC contracts
  • No native EHR write-back; EHR Push is a browser-extension auto-fill
  • EHR Push limited to four EHRs and locked to the Premier tier
  • ICD-10 coding, referral letters, and visit summaries gated behind Premier
  • Starter plan capped at 40 notes per month
  • No public API for custom integrations

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.