Skip to main content

Langfuse vs Helicone vs Braintrust

LangfuseHeliconeBraintrust

Open-source LLM observability and evaluation

Visit

Open-source LLM observability and AI gateway in one line of code.

Visit

Eval-first evaluation and observability platform for AI applications.

Visit
Votes000
PricingFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
CategoryCodingCodingCoding
Tags
llm-observabilityopen-sourcetracingevaluationprompt-management
llm-observabilityai-gatewayopen-sourcemonitoringcaching
llm-evaluationobservabilityprompt-engineeringci-cdllmops
Best for
  • Teams wanting open-source LLM observability
  • Data-sensitive teams needing self-hosting
  • Prompt and evaluation workflows
  • Teams wanting simple, cheap LLM logging
  • Developers self-hosting an open-source gateway
  • Cost and usage monitoring across providers
  • Teams making evaluation a first-class part of development
  • Organizations wanting CI/CD quality gates for AI
  • Product and AI engineering teams iterating on prompts
Pros
  • Open source with nearly all features MIT-licensed
  • Self-host the full product free, no seat or usage caps
  • Framework-agnostic (works with or without LangChain)
  • Strong tracing, prompt management, and evaluation
  • Managed cloud with a free tier available
  • Extremely easy integration via a one-line base-URL swap
  • Open source under Apache 2.0 and free to self-host
  • Tiny Docker image that runs almost anywhere
  • Gateway features like caching, failover, and rate limiting cut cost and improve reliability
  • Generous free tier of 10,000 requests per month
  • Deep, eval-first feature set with scorers, experiments, and statistical rigor
  • Strong CI/CD integration to catch regressions before deploy
  • Usage-based pricing with unlimited users, so no per-seat penalty
  • Powerful playground for prompt iteration and comparison
  • Tight loop between production logs and evaluation datasets
Cons
  • Self-hosting still requires running infrastructure
  • Enterprise compliance features are commercial
  • Cloud Pro tier jumps significantly in price
  • Focused on observability, not app building
  • Analytics depth may need tuning for large scale
  • Product is in maintenance mode after the Mintlify acquisition, with no roadmap
  • Long-term hosted-service viability is uncertain and migration may be needed
  • Usage-based overages mean the Pro price is a floor, not a cap
  • Short retention on lower tiers (7 days free, 30 days Pro)
  • Large price jump from Pro to Team for compliance features
  • Not open source; source-available and hosted model
  • Self-hosting locked to the Enterprise tier and a license key
  • Big price jump from free to $249 per month
  • SSO, RBAC, and self-host are gated behind Enterprise
  • Data- and score-based billing makes costs less predictable at volume

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.