Skip to main content
Tgtoolglade.
Side-by-side
Browse all comparisons →

Gram by Speakeasy vs Cortex

Gram by SpeakeasyCortex

Bottom line: Gram by Speakeasy for aPI-first companies; Cortex for aPI teams with maintained specifications.

Gram by SpeakeasyGram by Speakeasy

Serverless platform to build, curate, and host tools as MCP servers

Visit
CortexCortex

Turn API specifications into docs, typed SDKs, and an MCP server

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreemiumFree
CategoryMcpMcp
Tags
mcpopenapitool-hostingspeakeasyserverless
mcp serverapi documentationsdk generationopenapiopen source
Best for
  • API-first companies
  • Teams building agent tools
  • Enterprises needing tool governance
  • API teams with maintained specifications
  • Teams exposing APIs to agents via MCP
  • Open-source projects needing docs and SDKs
Pros
  • Generates MCP servers from OpenAPI
  • Custom TypeScript and Python tools
  • Serverless managed hosting
  • OAuth 2.1 with DCR and PKCE
  • RBAC, audit logs, compliance reporting
  • MIT licensed with a public repository
  • Generates docs, SDKs, and an MCP server from one spec
  • Supports OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, GraphQL, gRPC, and OpenRPC
  • Eleven SDK output languages
  • Fully self-hostable, deployable anywhere Node runs
Cons
  • Best value with existing OpenAPI specs
  • Newer platform in a fast-moving space
  • MCP ecosystem still maturing
  • Advanced governance likely paid
  • Requires MCP familiarity
  • Output quality depends entirely on spec quality
  • No hosted service or commercial support
  • Requires a build step in your pipeline
  • No team collaboration features
  • Young project with a small ecosystem

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.