Skip to main content
Tgtoolglade.
Side-by-side
Browse all comparisons →

Freed vs TORTUS

FreedTORTUS

Bottom line: Freed for solo and independent clinicians; TORTUS for nHS and health-system deployments.

FreedFreed

Ambient AI medical scribe that listens to patient visits and writes structured clinical notes in minutes.

Visit
TORTUSTORTUS

OSLER, a voice-and-vision clinical AI agent that works inside any EHR

Visit
Votes00
PricingPaidContact
CategoryHealthcareHealthcare
Tags
medical-scribehealthcareclinical-documentation
clinical-aiambient-documentationai-agentehrnhs
Best for
  • Solo and independent clinicians
  • Small private practices
  • Telehealth providers
  • NHS and health-system deployments
  • Practices seeking in-EHR automation
  • Clinicians burdened by admin
Pros
  • Fast, accurate SOAP notes generated in one to two minutes
  • Simple, transparent pricing that fits solo clinicians
  • Understands 90+ languages and handles mid-visit code-switching
  • HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II compliant
  • Learns each clinician's formatting and note style over time
  • Agentic: voice, vision, and click-based actions
  • Works across existing EHRs without bespoke integration
  • Safety 'Shell' targets hallucination reduction
  • Built with the NHS
  • Founded by a former clinician
Cons
  • No native EHR write-back; EHR Push is a browser-extension auto-fill
  • EHR Push limited to four EHRs and locked to the Premier tier
  • ICD-10 coding, referral letters, and visit summaries gated behind Premier
  • Starter plan capped at 40 notes per month
  • No public API for custom integrations
  • Early-stage, small company
  • No public pricing; sold to organizations
  • Safety claims need independent validation
  • Requires clinician review of all output
  • Limited to institutional buyers

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.