Skip to main content
Tgtoolglade.
Side-by-side
Browse all comparisons →

Cortex vs Gram by Speakeasy

CortexGram by Speakeasy

Bottom line: Cortex for aPI teams with maintained specifications; Gram by Speakeasy for aPI-first companies.

CortexCortex

Turn API specifications into docs, typed SDKs, and an MCP server

Visit
Gram by SpeakeasyGram by Speakeasy

Serverless platform to build, curate, and host tools as MCP servers

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreeFreemium
CategoryMcpMcp
Tags
mcp serverapi documentationsdk generationopenapiopen source
mcpopenapitool-hostingspeakeasyserverless
Best for
  • API teams with maintained specifications
  • Teams exposing APIs to agents via MCP
  • Open-source projects needing docs and SDKs
  • API-first companies
  • Teams building agent tools
  • Enterprises needing tool governance
Pros
  • MIT licensed with a public repository
  • Generates docs, SDKs, and an MCP server from one spec
  • Supports OpenAPI, AsyncAPI, GraphQL, gRPC, and OpenRPC
  • Eleven SDK output languages
  • Fully self-hostable, deployable anywhere Node runs
  • Generates MCP servers from OpenAPI
  • Custom TypeScript and Python tools
  • Serverless managed hosting
  • OAuth 2.1 with DCR and PKCE
  • RBAC, audit logs, compliance reporting
Cons
  • Output quality depends entirely on spec quality
  • No hosted service or commercial support
  • Requires a build step in your pipeline
  • No team collaboration features
  • Young project with a small ecosystem
  • Best value with existing OpenAPI specs
  • Newer platform in a fast-moving space
  • MCP ecosystem still maturing
  • Advanced governance likely paid
  • Requires MCP familiarity

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.