Elicit Review (2026): AI Research Assistant for Academic Literature

What is Elicit?

Elicit is an AI research assistant built specifically for academic and scientific researchers who need to search, summarize, and extract data from scholarly literature. The platform provides semantic search across 138 million academic papers and 545,000 clinical trials, with AI-powered tools that automate traditionally time-consuming research workflows like literature reviews, data extraction, and synthesis.

Developed by Ought (now operating as Elicit), the tool has grown to serve over 5 million researchers across academia and industry. Unlike general-purpose AI assistants, Elicit is purpose-built for evidence-based research, with features designed around the specific needs of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and scientific literature exploration. The company reports validation metrics showing 95% search recall, 97% abstract screening accuracy, 99% full-text screening accuracy, and 96% extraction accuracy across 994 Cochrane reviews.

The core value proposition is speed without sacrificing rigor—Elicit aims to help researchers become "10x more evidence-based" by handling the mechanical parts of literature review while maintaining the accuracy standards required for academic work.

Key features

Semantic search across 138M+ papers: Unlike keyword-based search engines, Elicit uses semantic understanding to find relevant papers even when they don't use your exact terminology. You can search in natural language, and the system returns papers ranked by relevance rather than just keyword matches. This is particularly valuable when exploring unfamiliar research areas where you don't yet know the field-specific vocabulary.

Automated report generation: The Research Agent feature generates structured research reports with citations in seconds. You input a research question, and Elicit searches the literature, synthesizes findings, and produces a report with proper citations. The Basic plan includes 2 automated reports per month, while Pro subscribers get 144 reports per year (12 per month).

Data extraction and table building: Elicit can extract specific data points from papers and organize them into structured tables. The Basic plan allows adding 2 columns at a time, while Pro users can add 20 columns simultaneously. This feature is designed for systematic reviews where you need to extract consistent data points (like sample sizes, methodologies, or outcomes) across dozens or hundreds of papers.

Systematic Review Workflow: Available on the Pro plan, this dedicated workflow can screen up to 5,000 papers specifically for systematic reviews. It includes features for abstract screening, full-text screening, and extraction—the core stages of a formal systematic review process.

Chat with papers and unlimited summaries: All plans include unlimited chat functionality with papers that have full-text access, plus unlimited summaries. This allows you to ask specific questions about papers and get AI-generated answers with sentence-level citations pointing to exact passages.

Pricing

Elicit uses a freemium model with three main tiers:

Basic (Free): Includes unlimited search across 138M+ papers, unlimited summaries, unlimited chat with full-text papers, 2 automated reports per month, and the ability to add 2 columns to tables at a time. Also includes Zotero import and source viewing for AI answers. This is genuinely usable for casual research exploration.

Pro ($49/month or $588/year): The annual plan saves 35% compared to monthly billing. Includes 144 reports per year, the Systematic Review Workflow (screens 5,000 papers), 20 columns per table, reports that extract from up to 135 data sources, 10 personalized research alerts, custom extractions from uploaded papers, explanations for AI answers, multiple output templates, and API access. This is positioned for researchers conducting formal systematic reviews.

Scale ($169/month or $2,028/year): Saves 39% with annual billing. Includes everything in Pro plus full Research Agent access, figure extraction and interpretation, and real-time collaboration features for teams.

There's no free trial for paid plans, but the free Basic tier provides enough functionality to evaluate whether the tool fits your workflow before upgrading.

What works well

The accuracy metrics are impressive and independently validated. Achieving 95%+ accuracy across multiple stages of systematic review (search, screening, extraction) against Cochrane reviews—the gold standard in evidence synthesis—suggests Elicit can genuinely support rigorous academic work rather than just casual exploration.

The semantic search delivers meaningful time savings when you're exploring unfamiliar territory. Multiple users on Reddit report that Elicit helps them get oriented in new research areas faster than traditional keyword searches, particularly because you don't need to know all the right terminology upfront.

The free tier is genuinely functional, not a trial disguised as a free plan. Unlimited search and summaries with 2 reports per month is enough for graduate students doing exploratory research or professionals who need occasional deep dives into academic literature.

What could be better

Search sensitivity appears lower than traditional databases in some cases. One PubMed study noted that while Elicit simplifies the review process, it "may miss some papers" compared to comprehensive database searches. For systematic reviews requiring exhaustive search strategies, you'll likely still need to supplement Elicit with traditional database searches.

The pricing jump from free to Pro is significant—$588/year is a substantial investment for individual researchers, particularly graduate students or early-career academics without institutional funding. There's no intermediate tier between "2 reports per month" and "144 reports per year," which leaves a gap for users who need more than casual access but less than full systematic review capabilities.

Figure extraction and interpretation—increasingly important as research becomes more visual—is locked behind the $2,028/year Scale plan. This feature would be more accessible at the Pro tier for individual researchers who need it.

Who is Elicit best for?

Elicit is purpose-built for academic and scientific researchers conducting literature reviews, particularly those working on systematic reviews or meta-analyses. If you're a graduate student, postdoc, or faculty member who regularly needs to synthesize research across dozens or hundreds of papers, the Pro plan's systematic review workflow and extraction capabilities will save substantial time.

It's also valuable for industry researchers in evidence-based fields like healthcare, pharmaceuticals, or policy research who need to stay current with academic literature and produce evidence syntheses. The API access on Pro plans enables integration into organizational workflows.

Researchers exploring new fields benefit significantly from the semantic search, even on the free plan. If you're moving into an unfamiliar research area and need to get oriented quickly without knowing all the field-specific terminology, Elicit's natural language search provides a gentler entry point than traditional academic databases.

Who should skip it?

If you're conducting systematic reviews that require absolute comprehensiveness and will be published in high-impact journals, Elicit should supplement rather than replace traditional database searches. The lower search sensitivity means you risk missing relevant papers if you rely on it exclusively.

Researchers who primarily work with non-English literature or highly specialized databases outside Elicit's 138M paper corpus won't find sufficient coverage. The tool is optimized for mainstream academic publishing, primarily in English.

If you need AI research assistance but don't specifically need academic paper search and extraction, general-purpose tools like ChatGPT with web search or Perplexity may be more cost-effective. Elicit's value is specifically in its academic paper corpus and research-specific features—if you're not using those, you're paying for capabilities you don't need.

Verdict

Elicit delivers on its core promise: making literature review faster without sacrificing the accuracy standards academic research requires. The 95%+ validation metrics against Cochrane reviews and the semantic search capabilities represent genuine advances over traditional keyword-based approaches. For researchers conducting systematic reviews or regularly synthesizing academic literature, the Pro plan's $588/year cost is justifiable given the time savings. However, the tool works best as a complement to traditional search methods rather than a complete replacement, particularly for research requiring exhaustive comprehensiveness. The free tier is generous enough for evaluation and casual use, making it low-risk to test whether Elicit fits your specific research workflow.