Skip to main content
Head-to-head comparison

Refact.ai vs Continue

Compare Refact.ai and Continue side by side across pricing, features, ratings, pros, cons, best-fit use cases, and alternatives.

Feature comparison

Feature
Refact.ai
Continue
Category
coding
coding
Pricing
Free plan
Free plan
Free plan
API access
Mobile app
Browser extension
Team collaboration
Custom training
Self-hosted option
Offline mode
Multi-language support

Refact.ai pros and cons

Fully open source with a permissive license
Can be self-hosted on-premise for data privacy
Bring-your-own-key across many model providers
Strong ranking among open-source agents on SWE-bench Verified
Self-hosting requires infrastructure and setup effort
Agent quality depends heavily on the chosen BYOK model
Smaller ecosystem and community than Cursor or Copilot

Continue pros and cons

Fully open-source, no required subscription
Supports any model, cloud or local
Deep customization via config-as-code
Works in VS Code and JetBrains
Steeper setup than plug-and-play tools
Quality depends on chosen models
Evolving product direction can shift features

Which one should you choose?

Best overall signal
Refact.ai

Selected using Toolglade popularity signals such as views and votes.

Best value signal
Refact.ai

Selected using free-plan availability and engagement signals.

Best for

Refact.ai

  • autonomous coding tasks
  • self-hosted code assistance
  • refactoring
  • Privacy-sensitive engineering teams
  • Open-source-first developers

Continue

  • local model users
  • customization-heavy teams
  • privacy-focused developers
  • Local-first developers
  • Teams wanting config-as-code

FAQ

Is Refact.ai better than Continue?

It depends on your use case. Compare category fit, pricing, feature availability, and ratings before choosing.

Which tool has a free plan?

Refact.ai and Continue offer a free plan based on current Toolglade data.