Skip to main content
Head-to-head comparison

n8n vs Clay

Compare n8n and Clay side by side across pricing, features, ratings, pros, cons, best-fit use cases, and alternatives.

n8n logo
n8n
automation

n8n is an open-source workflow automation platform that lets users build complex automations through a visual, node-based interface

Pricing
Free plan
Rating
Votes
0
Clay logo
Clay
automation

Clay is a B2B data enrichment and outbound automation platform that combines multiple data providers, AI-powered research agents (Claygents), and workflow automation for sales and marketing teams

Pricing
Free plan
Rating
Votes
0

Feature comparison

Feature
n8n
Clay
Category
automation
automation
Pricing
Free plan
Free plan
Free plan
API access
Mobile app
Browser extension
Team collaboration
Custom training
Self-hosted option
Offline mode
Multi-language support

n8n pros and cons

Open-source with fair-code license allowing self-hosting and custom function development
Visual node-based interface praised for flexibility and ease of use without extensive coding knowledge
Strong AI capabilities with 75% of workflows incorporating AI or LLM integrations as of 2024
Unlimited users and workflows across all plans, with pricing based on executions rather than seats
Note: Users criticize poor interface design, particularly inadequate JavaScript coding environment and navigation features
Note: Performance issues reported on cloud version when handling massive datasets
Note: Fixed node overview is a minor drawback according to reviews

Clay pros and cons

Waterfall enrichment combines multiple data providers for superior contact coverage compared to single-source tools
Users report 90% of sourced deals came directly from Clay, with significant revenue impact for sales teams
AI-powered Claygents can research companies and decision-makers by custom keywords and criteria
Easy deduplication process and intuitive interface for managing complex data workflows
Note: Steep learning curve makes it challenging for new users to adopt and start using effectively
Note: Pricing can become expensive, especially for teams with high data enrichment needs
Note: Some users find the platform complex compared to simpler alternatives, requiring time investment to master

Which one should you choose?

Best overall signal
n8n

Selected using Toolglade popularity signals such as views and votes.

Best value signal
n8n

Selected using free-plan availability and engagement signals.

Best for

n8n

  • Technical teams and developers who want self-hosting control and customization options
  • Organizations building AI agents and workflows with LLM integrations
  • Teams needing complex workflow automation without per-user pricing constraints
  • IT and security operations teams requiring extensive integration capabilities

Clay

  • Sales development teams running high-volume outbound campaigns who need maximum contact coverage
  • Go-to-market teams that want to combine data from multiple sources and automate research workflows
  • Companies tracking buying signals like job changes, promotions, or other intent data for timely outreach

FAQ

Is n8n better than Clay?

It depends on your use case. Compare category fit, pricing, feature availability, and ratings before choosing.

Which tool has a free plan?

n8n and Clay offer a free plan based on current Toolglade data.

Where can I find alternatives?

View n8n alternatives or view Clay alternatives.