Skip to main content
Tgtoolglade.
Side-by-side
Browse all comparisons →

TORTUS vs Freed

TORTUSFreed

Bottom line: TORTUS for nHS and health-system deployments; Freed for solo and independent clinicians.

TORTUSTORTUS

OSLER, a voice-and-vision clinical AI agent that works inside any EHR

Visit
FreedFreed

Ambient AI medical scribe that listens to patient visits and writes structured clinical notes in minutes.

Visit
Votes00
PricingPaidPaid
CategoryHealthcareHealthcare
Tags
clinical-aiambient-documentationai-agentehrnhs
medical-scribehealthcareclinical-documentation
Best for
  • NHS and health-system deployments
  • Practices seeking in-EHR automation
  • Clinicians burdened by admin
  • Solo and independent clinicians
  • Small private practices
  • Telehealth providers
Pros
  • Agentic: voice, vision, and click-based actions
  • Works across existing EHRs without bespoke integration
  • Safety 'Shell' targets hallucination reduction
  • Built with the NHS
  • Founded by a former clinician
  • Fast, accurate SOAP notes generated in one to two minutes
  • Simple, transparent pricing that fits solo clinicians
  • Understands 90+ languages and handles mid-visit code-switching
  • HIPAA and SOC 2 Type II compliant
  • Learns each clinician's formatting and note style over time
Cons
  • Early-stage, small company
  • No public pricing; sold to organizations
  • Safety claims need independent validation
  • Requires clinician review of all output
  • Limited to institutional buyers
  • No native EHR write-back; EHR Push is a browser-extension auto-fill
  • EHR Push limited to four EHRs and locked to the Premier tier
  • ICD-10 coding, referral letters, and visit summaries gated behind Premier
  • Starter plan capped at 40 notes per month
  • No public API for custom integrations

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.