Skip to main content

Polycam vs Meshy

PolycamMeshy

Bottom line: Polycam for 3D artists and modelers; Meshy for indie game developers needing assets fast.

Mobile 3D scanning with LiDAR, photogrammetry, and Gaussian splatting

Visit

Turn text or images into textured, riggable 3D models in seconds

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreemiumFreemium
Category3d3d
Tags
3d-scanningphotogrammetrylidargaussian-splattingar
text-to-3dimage-to-3d3d-modelingauto-rigginggame-assets
Best for
  • 3D artists and modelers
  • Architects and AEC professionals
  • AR and game developers
  • Indie game developers needing assets fast
  • 3D artists prototyping concepts
  • XR/AR and visualization creators
Pros
  • Supports LiDAR, photogrammetry, and Gaussian splatting
  • Exports to 15-plus formats for pro pipelines
  • Automatic floor plans with measurements
  • Runs on iOS, Android, and web with cloud processing
  • Team sharing and collaboration
  • Fast text-to-3D and image-to-3D generation
  • Automatic PBR texturing (metallic/roughness/normal)
  • Remeshing to a target polygon count
  • Auto-rigging and 500+ animations for characters
  • API, private assets and higher throughput on paid tiers
Cons
  • Best LiDAR quality needs supported Apple devices
  • Free tier restricts exports mostly to GLTF
  • Capture quality depends on lighting and technique
  • Professional use quickly requires a paid plan
  • Large scans can be processing- and storage-heavy
  • Generated topology often needs cleanup for production
  • Credit-based limits can add up for heavy users
  • Free-tier output uses a Creative Commons license
  • Complex or highly detailed models can be inconsistent
  • Fine artistic control is limited vs. manual modeling

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.