Skip to main content
Tgtoolglade.
Side-by-side
Browse all comparisons →

mcp.run vs Smithery

mcp.runSmithery

Bottom line: mcp.run for developers building on MCP; Smithery for developers discovering MCP servers.

mcp.runmcp.run

Platform to discover, install, and run MCP servers and tools

Visit
SmitherySmithery

The Docker Hub of MCP: discover, install, and host thousands of MCP servers.

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreemiumFreemium
CategoryMcpMcp
Tags
mcpmodel-context-protocolai-toolswebassemblyagent-tools
mcpregistryserver-hostingclidiscovery
Best for
  • Developers building on MCP
  • Teams distributing internal tools to agents
  • Security-conscious agent builders
  • Developers discovering MCP servers
  • People who want hosted endpoints with no setup
  • Server authors distributing their work
Pros
  • Curated registry of MCP servers/servlets
  • Portable, sandboxed Wasm execution model
  • Dynamic reprogrammable MCP server for on-demand tools
  • Built by Dylibso, a WebAssembly specialist
  • Works across MCP clients like Claude and Cursor
  • One of the largest MCP registries
  • Hosted endpoints remove local setup and dependency management
  • CLI makes local installation quick
  • Managed OAuth for hosted servers
  • Toolbox meta-MCP helps agents pick servers
Cons
  • Value depends on MCP ecosystem adoption
  • Wasm servlet model is a newer paradigm to learn
  • Registry breadth still maturing versus large directories
  • Primarily developer-focused
  • Enterprise features and pricing less publicized
  • Quality of long-tail community servers is inconsistent
  • Hosted execution and higher usage cost extra
  • Hosted-only for managed runtime; no self-hosting of the platform
  • Registry space is crowded and still consolidating
  • Security/trust of third-party servers is on the user

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.