Side-by-side

Knostic vs Lasso Security

KnosticLasso Security

Bottom line: Knostic for enterprises rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot; Lasso Security for enterprises deploying LLM copilots and agents.

	Knostic Need-to-know access controls for enterprise AI. Visit	Lasso Security End-to-end security for generative AI and agents Visit
Votes	0	0
Pricing	Paid	Paid
Category	Ai Security	Ai Security
Tags	ai-governancedata-securityllm-securityaccess-controlcopilot-security	ai-securityllm-securityguardrailsred-teamingshadow-ai
Best for	Enterprises rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot Organizations deploying Glean or similar AI search Security and governance teams worried about AI data leakage	Enterprises deploying LLM copilots and agents Security and AppSec teams needing AI visibility Regulated organizations governing employee AI use
Pros	Targets a real, under-addressed problem (inference-level oversharing) Complements existing DLP/governance tools rather than replacing them Founders are respected security veterans Recognized in RSAC, Black Hat and RSA Launch Pad competitions Prompt-simulation approach models real user access profiles	Purpose-built for generative-AI and agent risks rather than retrofitted Covers the full lifecycle: discover, assess, test, enforce Shadow-AI discovery surfaces usage security teams often miss Low-latency guardrails designed to sit in the request path Flexible deployment via gateway, API, or SDK
Cons	Early-stage company and nascent product category Value is tied to which AI assistants you deploy No public pricing or free tier Cloud-only; no self-hosted option advertised Overlaps with native controls in some Microsoft tooling	No public pricing; everything is sales-gated No free plan or self-serve trial Enterprise focus makes it a poor fit for small teams Fast-moving, crowded market makes durability hard to judge Effectiveness depends heavily on correct deployment and tuning

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.