Skip to main content
Tgtoolglade.
Side-by-side
Browse all comparisons →

Gram by Speakeasy vs Smithery

Gram by SpeakeasySmithery

Bottom line: Gram by Speakeasy for aPI-first companies; Smithery for developers discovering MCP servers.

Gram by SpeakeasyGram by Speakeasy

Serverless platform to build, curate, and host tools as MCP servers

Visit
SmitherySmithery

The Docker Hub of MCP: discover, install, and host thousands of MCP servers.

Visit
Votes00
PricingFreemiumFreemium
CategoryMcpMcp
Tags
mcpopenapitool-hostingspeakeasyserverless
mcpregistryserver-hostingclidiscovery
Best for
  • API-first companies
  • Teams building agent tools
  • Enterprises needing tool governance
  • Developers discovering MCP servers
  • People who want hosted endpoints with no setup
  • Server authors distributing their work
Pros
  • Generates MCP servers from OpenAPI
  • Custom TypeScript and Python tools
  • Serverless managed hosting
  • OAuth 2.1 with DCR and PKCE
  • RBAC, audit logs, compliance reporting
  • One of the largest MCP registries
  • Hosted endpoints remove local setup and dependency management
  • CLI makes local installation quick
  • Managed OAuth for hosted servers
  • Toolbox meta-MCP helps agents pick servers
Cons
  • Best value with existing OpenAPI specs
  • Newer platform in a fast-moving space
  • MCP ecosystem still maturing
  • Advanced governance likely paid
  • Requires MCP familiarity
  • Quality of long-tail community servers is inconsistent
  • Hosted execution and higher usage cost extra
  • Hosted-only for managed runtime; no self-hosting of the platform
  • Registry space is crowded and still consolidating
  • Security/trust of third-party servers is on the user

Comparison generated from each tool's listing. Add or remove tools above to change it.